Technological Dependency

Hello everyone. My rhetoric and media class is coming to an end and this will be my last post for the semester. Thank you all for following my posts these past months and hopefully you gained some insight into how technology is being used today, and it's potential in the future.

In this last blog post, I will be covering the topic of technological dependency. Cell phone addiction has become so prevalent that it now has a name: nomophobia. We have become so reliant on using our phones to carry out tasks that we may not know how to live effectively in society without it.

When you rely on something, there is less of an incentive to learn it for yourself, simply because you do not need to. This is why technology is so dangerous. For example, if you rely on a friend to give you answers in class, you do not need to know the content as well, because it is already done for you. If you lose the friend, then you are stuck in the class, far behind on the content. Similar to this, if you lose your phone, you are stuck in society with less knowledge on the things you used to look up on the internet before.

We rely on our phones for entertainment, knowledge, convenience, connectedness and many more things. Just like withdrawals from addiction, taking away someones phone can have psychological consequences. According to Tim Elmore in his article, Nomophobia: A Rising Trend in Students, 66 percent of adults in the United States suffer from nomophobia.

Articles like this show that the problem is only getting worse. As technology advances, our reliance increases. Since technology is everywhere, nomophobia may only be a temporary side effect, but it is definitely something to pay attention to. If technology becomes so advanced that we rely on it for most everything, then our lives will be dedicated to being machine operators.

Sweden Develops New Electronic Currency

Recently, Sweden has been working on making a digital form of currency. I first saw this when I was making a top ten list for people to follow on Twitter for a Rhetoric and Media class I am taking at Lewis and Clark College. I immediately starting thinking of ways Sweden could replace paper money with digital money and started doing research. According to Financial Times, the amounts of notes and coins have decreased in circulation by 40 percent from 2009 in Sweden. Digital transfer of currency through things like internet shopping has already started taking over.

Cecilia Skingsley, deputy governor at the Riksbank, told the Financial Times, “This is as revolutionary as the paper note 300 years ago. What does it mean for monetary policy and financial stability? How do we design this: a rechargeable card, an app or another way?” This reveals Riksburg bank is still in the beginning stages, but they believe it could have a huge impact on the way people spend money. 



Today in my economics class, we talked about black market exchanges. This term black market just means it does not account for the total GDP for the country. Most of the time, this consists of small unrecorded transactions between people. Electronic currency will replace this setback in tracking money and make results for economics more accurate.

No one has done this to the extent Sweden is planning on doing. The process might take a few years, but if it is successful, they will set the bar for the rest of the world. Technology is being integrated in so many new ways of society, why not currency as well?

Sweden Develops New Electronic Currency

Recently, Sweden has been working on making a digital form of currency. I first saw this when I was making a top ten list for people to follow on Twitter for a Rhetoric and Media class I am taking at Lewis and Clark College. I immediately starting thinking of ways Sweden could replace paper money with digital money and started doing research. According to Financial Times, the amounts of notes and coins have decreased in circulation by 40 percent from 2009 in Sweden. Digital transfer of currency through things like internet shopping has already started taking over.

Cecilia Skingsley, deputy governor at the Riksbank, told the Financial Times, “This is as revolutionary as the paper note 300 years ago. What does it mean for monetary policy and financial stability? How do we design this: a rechargeable card, an app or another way?” This reveals Riksburg bank is still in the beginning stages, but they believe it could have a huge impact on the way people spend money. 



Today in my economics class, we talked about black market exchanges. This term black market just means it does not account for the total GDP for the country. Most of the time, this consists of small unrecorded transactions between people. Electronic currency will replace this setback in tracking money and make results for economics more accurate.

No one has done this to the extent Sweden is planning on doing. The process might take a few years, but if it is successful, they will set the bar for the rest of the world. Technology is being integrated in so many new ways of society, why not currency as well?

Role of Social Media in Elections

In this election, social media has had the biggest presence ever. News feeds across the world are filled with Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. This election was classified as historic. A main reason for this was everyone could be involved through the tools of social media.

In the past, campaigning, travel, and speeches have been a huge role in getting known as a candidate. These still play a part, but now a strong presence on social media is just as important. Whether the media portrays a positive or negative image, your name is still getting out there. Donald Trump, in particular, strongly took advantage of this. Most of the time this publicity was negative, but it effectively made him one of the most well known people in the world.

This election has shown us the power the internet now plays. Donald Trump has over 14 million followers on twitter, Hillary Clinton has 10.7 million, and Bernie Sanders has 2.8 million. These numbers are large, but do not even aproximate the number they actually reach. This reach can increase tenfold or more with retweets alone. It also does not include endless third party accounts that bank off of publicity from these candidates. However, this reach comes with it's drawbacks.

Oftentimes, negative aspects get seen the most. Yes, it gets the candidates name out there, but it also paints a very negative picture. When we see posts like this, we loose trust in what these candidates stand for. This creates problems. The President of the United States should be someone "we the people of the United States" should have confidence in to do good. The president is the leader of our country. The image he conveys carries over to us as a people whether we like it or not.

To show reach, here is an example of a third party account that made a video about the presidential debate. This is a copy of the video that got nearly 30 million views on Facebook. Presidential Debate Preview

The Integration of Social Norms

Today, technology is at the threshold for social norms. It has the power to change our actions based on what others see as popular. We have seen changes in social norms in things like planking, gym pics, duck face, and everyones favorite: selfies.

Believe it or not, there was once a time when selfies didn't exist. At first, this form of self imagery was not accepted by the public especially for the male role. Selfies were associated with being too self oriented. Now selfies are everywhere. What changed?

One reason is simply because we see famous people whom we respect doing these norms. For instance, Bradley Cooper's selfie at the Oscars. This selfie with stars like Ellen DeGeneres, Brad Pitt, Meryl Streep, and others went instantly viral. This got huge hype online and made taking selfie's seem socially acceptable for the public.


Another way social norms have been integrated is through new platforms on the Internet. Snapchat and Instagram stories are based off of communicating through live events or face messaging. Now basic pictures of your face are going out of style as well. No, I'm not saying you're ugly. I am just talking about the new filters that are in almost every form of social media. This has changed the way people present themselves online. It is an interesting concept, because if only a few people did it, it could be considered a dishonest portrayal. However, since everyone is doing it, you are falling out of the social norm if you have less vibrant, unedited pictures.

In retrospect, the evolution of societies' norms are largely influenced from technology and the people using it. Who is to say what the next outbreak will be. All we can do is sit back and enjoy the ride.